Kim Heng Offshore & Marine Holding Limited - Annual Report 2015 - page 69

NOTICE OF ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING
statisTICS OF SHAREHOLDINGs
FINANCIAL CONteNts
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE REPORT
67
Navigating Challenges • EMBRACING DIVERSITY | ANNUAL REPORT 2015
Notes to the financial statements
3 Significant accounting policies (Cont’d)
3.8 Impairment (Cont’d)
(i)
Non-derivative financial assets (Cont’d)
Objective evidence that financial assets are impaired can include default or delinquency by a debtor,
restructuring of an amount due to the Group on terms that the Group would not consider otherwise,
or indications that a debtor or issuer will enter bankruptcy, adverse changes in the payment status of
borrowers or issuers in the Group.
Loans and receivables
The Group considers evidence of impairment for loans and receivables at both a specific asset and
collective level. All individually significant loans and receivables are assessed for specific impairment. All
individually significant loans and receivables found not to be specifically impaired are then collectively
assessed for any impairment that has been incurred but not yet identified. Loans and receivables that
are not individually significant are collectively assessed for impairment by grouping together loans and
receivables with similar risk characteristics.
In assessing collective impairment, the Group uses historical trends of the probability of default, the
timing of recoveries and the amount of loss incurred, adjusted for management’s judgement as to
whether current economic and credit conditions are such that the actual losses are likely to be greater or
less than suggested by historical trends.
An impairment loss in respect of a financial asset measured at amortised cost is calculated as the
difference between its carrying amount and the present value of the estimated future cash flows,
discounted at the asset’s original effective interest rate. Losses are recognised in profit or loss and
reflected in an allowance account against loans and receivables. Interest on the impaired asset continues
to be recognised. When the Group considers that there are no realistic prospects of recovery of the
asset, the relevant amounts are written off. If the amount of impairment loss subsequently decreases
and the decrease can be related objectively to an event occurring after the impairment was recognised,
then the previously recognised impairment loss is reversed through profit or loss.
(ii)
Non-financial assets
The carrying amounts of the Group’s non-financial assets are reviewed at each reporting date to
determine whether there is any indication of impairment. If any such indication exists, then the asset’s
recoverable amount is estimated. An impairment loss is recognised if the carrying amount of an asset or
its related cash-generating unit (“CGU”) exceeds its estimated recoverable amount.
The recoverable amount of an asset or CGU is the greater of its value in use and its fair value less costs to
sell. In assessing value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using
a pre-tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the
risks specific to the asset or CGU. For the purpose of impairment testing, assets that cannot be tested
individually are grouped together into the smallest group of assets that generates cash inflows from
continuing use that are largely independent of the cash inflows of other assets or CGU.
The Group’s corporate assets do not generate separate cash inflows and are utilised by more than
one CGU. Corporate assets are allocated to CGUs on a reasonable and consistent basis and tested for
impairment as part of the testing of the CGU to which the corporate asset is allocated.
Impairment losses are recognised in profit or loss. Impairment losses recognised in respect of CGUs are
allocated to reduce the carrying amounts of assets in the CGU on a
pro rata
basis.
1...,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68 70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,...110
Powered by FlippingBook